IS OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH REALLY NECESSARY?

by | Jun 15, 2017

In the case of Pacey v Caterpillar Logistics, the employer decided to dismiss an employee who was on long-term sick due to a bad back, but whom was ‘caught on camera’ doing a range of normal things including driving, shopping etc.

Caterpillar Logistics said that Pacey had exaggerated his injury and sacked him. But when the employee explained the allegation away, saying that his GP had advised ‘light exercise’ (corroborated by the GP) the tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair. 

Because the investigation that was carried out was found to be insufficient – there should have been an occupational health assessment. 

Had the employer invested in an occupational health report which substantiated their conclusions, the outcome could have been a whole lot different. Instead they assumed their own minimal medical knowledge to reach their conclusions.

Occupational Health reports are an important document when trying to dismiss an employee for ill health, please contact me for further information. 

 

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace:

What Employers Need to Know About the New Legal Duty from October 2024 From October 2024, employers across the UK were subject to a new legal duty to actively prevent sexual harassment in the workplace. This marks a significant shift from previous legislation, where...

It’s February and love is in the air!

The longest month of the year is over and hopefully we can look forward to some better weather and some lighter nights. It's February and love is in the air! Let's talk about personal relationships at work and how they could be an issue for you the employer: Workplace...